Comparison of intraoperative oxygenation and perioperative outcomes between thoracoscopic and open thoracic surgery during one-lung ventilation

Authors

  • Gergő Ráduly Department of Anatomy and Embryology, George Emil Palade University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Science, and Technology of Targu Mures, 540103 Târgu Mureș, Romania
  • Ionuț Branea Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, County Clinical Emergency Hospital, Târgu Mureș, Romania.
  • Irina Săplăcan Doctoral School of Medicine and Pharmacy, George Emil Palade University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Science and Technology of Targu Mures, 540142 Targu Mures, Romania
  • Raluca Ștefania Fodor Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, George Emil Palade University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Science and Technology of Târgu Mureș, 540103 Târgu Mureș, Romania

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62838/amsm-2026-0026

Keywords:

thoracoscopy, thoracotomy, one-lung ventilation, intraoperative oxygenation, perioperative outcomes

Abstract

Objective: To compare intraoperative and postoperative oxygenation, ventilatory parameters, and early perioperative outcomes between patients undergoing thoracoscopic and open thoracic surgery with one-lung ventilation.

Methods: This single-center retrospective study included 42 adults undergoing elective thoracic surgery with one-lung ventilation in 2025. Patients were classified by the initially planned approach as thoracotomy (n = 29) or thoracoscopy (n = 13); three conversions to thoracotomy remained in the thoracoscopy group. Baseline characteristics, procedural complexity, intraoperative and postoperative oxygenation, ventilatory settings, and early perioperative outcomes were analyzed.

Results: Baseline age, sex, body mass index, ASA physical status, and preoperative peripheral oxygen saturation did not differ significantly between groups, whereas major thoracic procedures were more frequent in the thoracotomy group (58.6% vs. 15.4%, p = 0.017). During one-lung ventilation, peripheral oxygen saturation was higher in the thoracoscopy group (98% [IQR 94–100] vs. 90% [IQR 89–95], p = 0.011; Hodges–Lehmann estimate 5 percentage points, bootstrap 95% CI 1–8). The duration of one-lung ventilation was longer in the thoracotomy group (130 [IQR 115–180] vs. 60 [IQR 50–140] minutes, p = 0.038; Hodges–Lehmann estimate 50 minutes, bootstrap 95% CI 0–80). Intraoperative PaO₂/FiO₂ ratio, shunt fraction, postoperative oxygenation, ventilatory settings, and other early outcomes were similar.

Conclusions: Open thoracotomy was associated with longer one-lung ventilation, whereas thoracoscopy was associated with higher peripheral oxygen saturation during one-lung ventilation. The imbalance in procedural complexity and the attenuation of the saturation difference after exclusion of conversions indicate that these exploratory associations should not be interpreted as causal.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

05-08-2026

How to Cite

1.
Ráduly G, Branea I, Săplăcan I, Fodor R Ștefania. Comparison of intraoperative oxygenation and perioperative outcomes between thoracoscopic and open thoracic surgery during one-lung ventilation. AMM [Internet]. 2026 Aug. 5 [cited 2026 Aug. 13];72(1). Available from: https://ojs.actamedicamarisiensis.ro/index.php/amm/article/view/1015

Issue

Section

Original article

Categories