GV Urinary retention in female after augmentation gluteoplasty (Case report)

Authors

  • Veronica Maria Ghirca University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Science and Technology from Tg Mures
  • Anna E Frunda University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Science and Technology from Tg Mures
  • Daniel Porav-Hodade University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Science and Technology from Tg Mures
  • Calin Chibelean University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Science and Technology from Tg Mures
  • Ciprian Todea-Moga University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Science and Technology from Tg Mures
  • Oliver Vida University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Science and Technology from Tg Mures
  • Orsolya Martha University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Science and Technology from Tg Mures

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2478/amma-2020-0011

Keywords:

Uroflowmetry, urodynamic investigations, urinary retention, gluteal augmentation, buttock implantation

Abstract

Case:  There are many well known complications after gluteal augmentation surgery, such as: seroma, haematoma, capsular contracture, retraction, wound dehiscence etc., but there are some due to nervous damage (especially submuscular pockets with large implants) insufficiently recognized.

         The aim of this case report is to highlight a rare complication (urinary retention) after gluteal augmentation surgery with use of solid silicone implants in case of 41 year old female. 

         Woman aged 41 with a buttock augmentation with silicon implant (submuscular pocket, 300cc) performed 2 month before at plastic surgery service in Madrid, was admitted in our service, the Clinic of Urology from Tg. Mures,  with permanent bladder catheter inserted for urinary retention.  

Outcome:  At the admission, two month after the surgery the clinical examination revealed a permeable urinary catheter with clear urine and a fistulised wound infection localized in the superior 1/3 of the incision in the intergluteal sulcus. Neither neurological or gynecological examination identified any pathology. After the removal of the catheter, next day the  abdominal ultrasonography showed a distended bladder, with a postvoid residual urine volume of 320 ml. Urodynamic   investigations   (uroflowmetry, pressure flow studies) revealed  a reduced Qmax. 7,6 ml/sec, underactive detrusor with a reduced BCI value of 60 (bladder contractility index) , requiring self intermittent catheterization, associated  with antibiotherapy and alfablocants.

Conclusions:  Buttock implantation is a frequently used plastic surgery procedure with  rather high rate of complications, some of them not well identified, unknown such as  detrusor underactivity leading to urinary retention.

Downloads

Published

21-01-2026

How to Cite

1.
Ghirca VM, Frunda AE, Porav-Hodade D, Chibelean C, Todea-Moga C, Vida O, et al. GV Urinary retention in female after augmentation gluteoplasty (Case report). AMM [Internet]. 2026 Jan. 21 [cited 2026 Feb. 10];66(2). Available from: https://ojs.actamedicamarisiensis.ro/index.php/amm/article/view/7

Issue

Section

Case report

Most read articles by the same author(s)