Comparison of two different file systems on postoperative pain after root canal instrumentation: A randomized controlled trial

canal preperation post instrumentation pain

  • Saad Shahnawaz mds
  • Nabiya Shahroz Shifa international hospital
  • Muhammad Ahmed Zafar Islamic International Dental Hospital
  • Shahroz Sajjad AFID hospital
  • Mehwish Pasha Shifa international hospital
  • Arfa Sabir Hussain Islamic International Dental Hospital
Keywords: Hyflex CM, Post instrumentation, Conventional files, VAS.

Abstract

Introduction: In this study post instrumentation pain is evaluated between rotary hyflex CM files and conventional k-files at different time intervals. Methodology: fifty patients were equally assigned into two groups and instrumented using hyflex cm or conventional files. VAS for pain was noted before the start of a root canal and after the procedure at 12, 24, and 48 hours. Results: There was no significant difference at 12, 24, and 48 hours with P values being 0.127, 0.867, and 0.846 respectively. Conclusion: There is no significant difference in causing post instrumentation pain between hyflex CM and conventional files at different time intervals. However, when accessing preop pain of conventional file group, it had more pain mean score compared to hyflex group. According to this study, Conventional files may be able to slightly decrease the chances of post-instrumentation pain more than hyflex CM instrumentation.

Published
2023-02-08
How to Cite
1.
Shahnawaz S, Shahroz N, Zafar MA, Sajjad S, Pasha M, Sabir Hussain A. Comparison of two different file systems on postoperative pain after root canal instrumentation: A randomized controlled trial. amm [Internet]. 8Feb.2023 [cited 21Nov.2024];69(1). Available from: https://ojs.actamedicamarisiensis.ro/index.php/amm/article/view/224
Section
Original article